Lanning, MatthewWang, LixinBenson, MichaelZhang, QuanNovick, Kimberly A.2021-09-012021-09-012020-07Lanning, M., Wang, L., Benson, M., Zhang, Q., & Novick, K. A. (2020). Canopy isotopic investigation reveals different water uptake dynamics of maples and oaks. Phytochemistry, 175, 112389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112389https://hdl.handle.net/1805/26567Variations in drought responses exhibited by cohabiting tree species such as Acer sacharrum and Quercus alba have often been attributed to differences in rooting depth or water accessibility. A. sacharrum is thought to be a shallow rooted species, and is assumed to not have access to the deep and stable water resources available to Q. alba. As such, A. sacharrum conserves water by minimizing stomatal conductance under drought conditions whereas Q. alba does not. However, detailed records of sufficient temporal resolution which integrate water accessibility, meteorological drivers, and leaf level parameters (e.g., photosynthesis, stomatal conductance) are lacking, making such assumptions—though plausible— largely untested. In this study, we investigated the water accessibility of both maples (A. sacharrum) and oaks (Q. alba) during the late growing season using novel canopy stable isotope measurements. Our results showed that maples can draw from the same water pool as cohabitating oaks, but can also switch to a shallow water source in response to available moisture in the shallow soil profile. We also found that maples tended to use a deep water source under high vapor pressure deficit even when shallow soil water was available. On the other hand, oaks had consistent deep water access during our study period. It is noted that our measurements do not cover the whole growing season and should be extrapolated with caution. Such findings indicate that differences in leaf functions during drought between maples and oaks may be due to both soil water accessibility and atmospheric water demand.enPublisher PolicyconductancedroughtecohydrologyArticle